To start talking about digital divide, we should firstly define what it is. The digital divide refers to the gap between people with effective access to digital and information technology and those with very limited or no access at all. It includes the imbalance both in physical access to technology and the resources and skills needed to effectively participate as a digital citizen. Knowledge divide reflects the access of various social groupings to information and knowledge, typically gender, income, race, and by location.
Our point of view on digital divide is made based on analyzing views of Jack Kemp freedom work, UK government, Howard J. Blitz and EU Commission.
First of all, we would like to discuss UK government plan of tackling digital divide. As we think it is quite bright idea to lease computers to pupils. This will provide all pupils, even in villages or far away towns with teaching materials. As we all know, investing to children is a good investment. Children are our future and this investment will somehow ensure our bright future. In another words, this is the long term investment for the country. But UK government has no plan for other groups. They are ignoring such groups as pensioners, disabled persons and others. In their point of view there is no single word about this issue. Even if the person is old or disabled he or she shouldn’t be left behind the development. They are part of the society as we all are.
Another advantage of this plan is removing barriers such as cost, lack of training and confidence. This is definitely the key to success. This issue can essentially decrease digital divide. Also government is concerned about local authorities and how they work with their citizens. This issue is also an advantage. With the help of computer technologies and databases, all procedures between authorities and citizens will be standardized and personal contact will be more polite. Moreover, people will be able to use this service without leaving home and queering.
Second thing is from Howard J. Blitz. It is a fact that government’s budget is made of tax payment. But as we think, government should bring benefits to their citizens. We think that paying taxes to the government in order to carry out digital divide is worthy. This will lead to citizens’ living standards upgrade and development of the country. The only thing is that government should not use violent actions or threats of such actions to make people pay. People should know and be sure that their money “is working for them”. This is the only way to make this system work.
Next one is EU Commission. It is said that it may declare broadband “a universal right”. From our point of view, it is wonderful plan that can be used not only in European Union but in the whole world. We all know how awful it is to have slow internet, when every link is opening very slow, users are becoming tired and so on. But imagine what if internet would be quite fast. It will change everything. People will be able to run their eBusiness from everywhere. But the only problem of this issue is money. Companies that provide such high speed internet should be supported by the government because the costs of such internet are really high.
The last view to analyze is by Jack Kemp. He says “Many folks in government are looking for a digital divide problem to solve when they should be reforming taxes, lowering interest rate, and removing regulatory barriers that stifle economic activity in poor urban communities all over America”. This is a two-side problem. When people are trying to concentrate on one problem, other problems are starting to grow. As we think, he is right when he says that the government should take some steps towards solving economic problems. But Jack Kemp is wrong when he is talking about tradeoff between solving economical problems and digital divide.
According to these views and our own experience and thoughts we made some outputs. First of all, we think that every country is aiming to be fully digitally covered. If it won’t be, so more and more people will be coming to big cities where internet is available. The movement of the people to the crowded cities will be inevitable. Another thing is that there should be no discrimination. Every person should be able to use internet and all sources of information. This can be done with some courses that government can organize for some small fee. The output for this action will be great. Also we think that government should make contracts and agreements with companies providing internet. Maybe dividing the country to sectors and allowing the company to work in limited sectors will make profit for all.




